To understand how to optimize content for large language models, it’s helpful to know at a high level how they actually work.
While the specifics vary across models like GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and others, the core architecture and logic are largely consistent. With the main objective of LLMs being to predict the next token (word or subword) given previous ones.
TL;DR:
This guide breaks down how Large Language Models (LLMs) work in the context of SEO and search visibility from tokenization and entity recognition to RAG and ranking. Learn how to structure your SaaS content to get cited by AI platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity. Includes data-backed citation trends, retrieval mechanics, and future search predictions.
User Prompt
↓
Tokenization → Semantic Embedding
↓
Search Intent + Entity Understanding
↓
Inference via Transformer Layers
↓
RAG, if needed → Injected into Prompt
↓
Next-Token Prediction + Scoring
↓
Answer Generation & Final Output
You provide an input: a question, instruction, or statement.
“What is the best SEO agency for SaaS companies doing 1.5M MRR?”
The LLM breaks your text into tokens, which are then converted into embeddings, numerical vectors that represent the semantic meaning of each word.
These embeddings position the tokens in a multi-dimensional space, enabling semantic matching beyond keyword overlap.
Traditional search matches queries to documents via keyword overlap. In contrast, LLMs convert both queries and documents into embeddings and retrieve information based on semantic similarity.
Example: A user asks, “Top SEO firms for SaaS startups.” The LLM may retrieve a page optimized for “best B2B SaaS SEO agencies” even if those exact words don’t appear because their embeddings are close in vector space.
The system classifies the user’s query by intent and extracts key entities.
Intent affects:
Entity extraction helps the model contextualize:
Behind the scenes, models are influenced by system prompts, invisible instructions that shape the tone, structure, and constraints of a response.
Examples:
Some LLMs like Claude and GPT-4o are instruction-tuned trained on thousands of example prompts/responses.
This means SEO isn’t just about the content you write, but how well it aligns with the model’s internal expectations and goals.
This is where the “thinking” happens. The Transformer architecture uses self-attention layers to model contextual relationships between tokens.
Each layer improves the model’s grasp of:
If the LLM needs updated or specific data, it uses RAG to retrieve documents before generating an answer.
RAG Pipeline:
StepDescriptionQueryEmbed + fan-out your query into variantsRetrievePull matching docs from vector DBs or search APIsAugmentInject docs into the prompt contextGenerateUse prompt + docs to produce grounded output
To be cited in this process, format your content into clear, structured ~200-word chunks with headings, schema, and entities.
LLMs predict the next token based on probabilities and continue recursively until the full response is built.
Exalt Growth [0.86], Skale [0.63], Growth Plays [0.57], etc.
Tokens are decoded into human-readable text and served to the user.
“Best CRM tools for startups 2025”
Profound’s analysis of 30 million citations across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot revealed:
Best Practices:
A Large Language Model (LLM) is an AI system trained on massive amounts of text data to understand and generate human language. In the context of search, LLMs process queries, extract intent, retrieve relevant content, and generate answers instead of just serving links.
LLMs rely on semantic embeddings to match your query with the most relevant documents. In Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), they use vector databases or search APIs to retrieve semantically related content. Factors like structure, authority, freshness, and clarity impact your content’s chances of being retrieved and cited.
Traditional search engines match keywords exactly. LLMs use embedding-based search, comparing the meaning of your query to document vectors. This allows them to retrieve content that is semantically relevant, even if the exact words don’t match.
To optimize for LLMs:
No. Most models (like GPT-4o or Claude) use retrieval pipelines to pull from a cached index or vector DB. ChatGPT “Browse with Bing” and Perplexity are exceptions that query live sources. Gemini has native access to Google’s index.
Wikipedia’s clean structure, clear entity definitions, stable URLs, and lack of ads make it ideal for LLM retrieval and citation. Its semantic consistency and domain authority also contribute to frequent inclusion in AI responses.
SEO is evolving into Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) focusing on how to get cited, extracted, or summarized by AI models. The goal isn’t just to rank in blue links, but to become the source of truth within AI-generated answers across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and others.